Want to get bikers up in arms? Revive a hallowed brand. Established manufacturers get a pass when producing ugly or ill-considered motorcycles, and nobody questions their right to exist, but a new manufacturer using an old name fights steep resistance, no matter how committed it is to the old name. Brough Superior owner Mark Upham is doing his best to honor the spirit of the late George Brough, which is probably impossible in the 21st Century, because Brough invented a genre – the luxury motorcycle – that was bombed out of existence in World War II.First-generation Brough Superiors were built between 1919 and 1940, and immediately earned a reputation for quality, innovation, handling, speed, and beauty. They were the most expensive and fastest motorcycles in the world, and their lustrous finish earned them the nickname ‘The Rolls-Royce of Motorcycles.”and Rolls didn’t object. Above all, George Brough was a PR genius, crafting an image via selected competitions (ones he was likely to win), flamboyant personal style, a gift for turning a phrase, and the regular patronage of celebrities like T.E. Lawrence, other wise known as Lawrence of Arabia. It isn’t likely for a motorcycle to be all those things today, as “fastest” seems irrelevant, most expensive is a matter of adding zeros, and today’s heroes are tomorrow’s targets for scandal. Just imagine a T.E. Lawrence cell phone hack, with his leather bedsheets and masochistic inclinations…Since we live in a different world today, what remains to link old Brough and new is aesthetics, innovation, and quality; the 2016 Brough Superior SS100 makes a strong pitch for all these. One of George’s innovations, and a hallmark of the brand, was the industry’s first saddle tank, which was nickeled up and shapely, with a rounded nose and pleasing proportions.The Vintagent Road Tests come straight from the saddle of the world’s rarest motorcycles. Catch the Road Test series here.
Brough Superiors were built between 1919 and 1940, and immediately earned a reputation for quality, innovation, handling, speed, and beauty.
The new Brough Superior lifts its tank design directly from a 1920s Pendine racing model, which used triple straps to bind tank to frame; it’s the visual DNA of a Brough Superior, and a feature Mark Upham insisted on. Underneath that old-school tank (built in polished aluminum) we leave the past behind and enter the 21st Century, with a unique motor and innovative chassis.
The heart of the beast is a V-twin of course, but set at 88-degrees, which provides perfect balance a lá Ducati and Moto Guzzi, but looks wide to a traditionalist. It’s a bespoke motor from the firm Boxer Design of Toulouse, France, a water-cooled, 8-valve DOHC unit of 997cc, produces 120 horsepower. That wide vee concurs with one of George’s last experimental Broughs, using an AMC-built (Matchless / AJS) 90-degree V-twin OHV engine, which was never serially produced. It thus bears a thread of a connection with the past, which turns out to have both lovely castings and contemporary performance, and most importantly isn’t an H-D clone. The Boxer Design engine is built and developed by Akira Engineering of Bayonne, which certainly has the chops – its Kawasaki ZX-10R engines currently dominate WSB racing.The chassis is both innovative and expensive, with a mix of titanium, aluminum and magnesium for the frame and swingarm, carbon-fiber wheels, aluminum bodywork, and a double-wishbone front fork. Front and rear suspension use Öhlins units, and that fork is a gift from Claude Fior, who never patented his design from the 1980s. It’s still avant-garde, but very well developed, with lots of track time; BMW’s Duolever fork is also Fior-based. While blade-type forks normally have zero brake dive, the Brough’s fork has a small amount engineered in to feel “normal” when the anchors are out. The small-diameter Behringer brakes, sourced from the aircraft industry, are incredibly powerful, with quad rotors on the front wheel; we featured them in Cycle World when Uwe Ehinger used a pair on his Kraftrad Speedster. Actual braking ability is the most radical departure from old Broughs, whose stopping power never equaled their 100mph potential, in the days when traffic was sparse.The specifications of the new Brough Superior have been discussed before, since the debut of the prototypes four years ago, but few road reports have made it to American shores, principally because Brough won’t be marketed here for a year or so (testing + regulations = $$$), and none are currently in the US. We’re a low priority, but that didn’t stop Boxer Design principal Thierry Henriette, the man who’s building the new Broughs, from allowing a test ride last June at the Wheels and Waves festival in Biarritz. The Pyrenees are legendary for motorcycling, with lightly-traveled mountain roads and 1000-year-old stone villages for scenery. My test was over the slightly more traveled coastal roads of the Corniche, which attracts a few tourists eager to photograph the Cote Basque, and get off ubiquitous toll highways. Luckily, access to this fantastic stretch of road between France and Spain is very poorly marked, so risky passing maneuvers were minimal.The SS100 is probably the lightest-looking liter bike on the market, with lots of empty space around the engine and beneath the saddle. The dry weight is just under 400 lb., excellent for a 120-hp machine, and throwing the bike around corners is easy-breezy. It’s not razor sharp like a racer; it feels like a fast street machine, and real-world handling is totally intuitive. I stepped off a 1974 Norton Commando, and onto the SS100, and the feeling was familiar at all speeds, except flat-out. At speeds over 100mph, the Brough was still charging hard, and pushing the bike through the Corniche’s bends felt completely stable, predictable, and modern. The power is yeehaw-level good, but not insane – let’s just say passing traffic wasn’t even a thought, and clear roads offered breathtakingly fun motorcycling, with super secure handling, a great noise, and the stunning looks of the bike. Even a good squeeze on those crazy Behringer brakes in mid-corner felt perfectly safe; there’s no ABS yet, so it’s best to keep your right hand supple. An hour’s ride back and forth on the coast road left me with a big smile, and a desire to own an SS100 – the “cheap” one that is. At £45,000 (about $60,000), the new SS100 is 10 percent the price of a 1920s model, and therefore a bargain! Well, any other bike is cheap by that metric.The Boxer engine is a bit reminiscent in feel of a mid-1920s JAP 990cc OHV racing motor, which was the heart of the original SS100. It wasn’t meant for the street, and had a nervous disposition, which the new motor shares. There’s a slight harshness to the primary and camshaft drive of the Boxer motor; you can feel the sharp edges of gears whirring around, with not much cushioning effect present. It isn’t bad, and it runs dead smooth, but that slight harshness is the sort of thing a few years’ development will probably eliminate. For a small producer’s wholly new engine, it’s something of a miracle it works so damn well. The gear change is firm and accurate, the clutch is progressive and strong, and the Öhlins suspension does its job unobtrusively. And the looks; love ‘em or hate ‘em, they’re distinctive, and telegraph the quality of the machine’s construction. My favorite model is all black, but my well used test bike harvested eyeballs everywhere it went – I haven’t attracted this much attention on two wheels since testing a Confederate Wraith. Everyone wants to know what it is, and non-bikers seem to love the design.I’ve spent more saddle time on vintage Brough Superiors than new sportbikes, having ridden both a 1925 Brough Superior SS100 and a 1933 Brough Superior 11.50 across the States in the Motorcycle Cannonball.. I’ve also been a B-S owner’s club member since the 1980s, having owned four models, back when they were semi-affordable to 99 percenters. Therefore, I’m the most likely candidate to make mouth-frothing accusations of “blasphemy!” for use of the Brough name, but I’ve known Mark Upham for years, and he’s also an arch enthusiast of the marque. That doesn’t mean he’ll make a decent new motorcycle, but when journalist Alan Cathcart introduced Upham to Boxer boss Thierry Henriette, he landed in the right hands. Henriette was excited by the project’s challenges, and has made an intriguing motorcycle that is totally up to date with terrific performance, a retro, classy vibe, and a totally unique look. It actually fills the vacant niche of the Gentleman’s Motorcycle. Would George have approved? I do believe he would.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh.!
But, where I once loathed this horror story, I am actually now coming round to to it. I can see the value of the technicals and simply, love that tank. Would I buy one were the funds available.. probably yes tho unlike you, you poseur.. I would not, could not, cope well with the attention.
Perhaps.?
And.. why do you describe the engine as a “Boxer”.? where it is to my eve, a V twin, or as Ducati perversely claim.. an L twin.
To the best of my knowledge and rememberance.. the BMW opposing twin was always “the Boxer twin”.
Any thoughts.?
Finally.. a photograph, of you.
Stafford show 2012.. the shot of the derriere of the chap with the shoulder bag is YOU.!
We had been chatting for some good while and as you moved away, the memsahib with the camera. Gotcha.!
Well, some of you anyway.
Regards
WF
https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipNyHrdI79IXYSxJmvsG6r0Q5L7inxZV7I2iKJt-
Hi William,
The Boxer reference is not to the engine configuration but to the company that designed the motor – Boxer Design in France. Clearly, it’s a V-twin!
all the best, Paul
Boutique snob bike ….. you can have it.
I wasn’t sure I liked it when I first saw the initial images but the design has grown on me. More so when I saw one in the metal. The standard of engineering is that of a watch maker. Snobby boutique machine ( see previous comment) well the car industry has accommodated them for years without complaint. Aside from everything else, not many people realise just how hard it is to produce a motorcycle, let alone a bespoke one with limited resources. Knowing Metisse well and the Midual team slightly less so, the effort and commitment required……..that will never return a profit on the development…….is something to be appreciated if not applauded. I hope the Brough Superior does well. At the current asking price, you may find it to be good value for money.
I’m probably being a bit miserable here, given the difficulty of producing a new motorcycle, but to my mind Mark Upham has missed the point, the Brough ethos was all about performance, being the fastest, the new brought takes styling cues from the original but not the ethos in my opinion, looks nice though!.
Mark, I think it’s impossible to replicate the conditions that made the first Brough Superior, superior! Except perhaps in quality. It makes no sense anymore to be fastest, or most expensive. This machine does qualify as a ‘luxury motorcycle’, in my opinion, which may be the only category left to fill! At least it’s not an S&S motor or some horror, this is original stuff, and really good too.
Hi Paul,
Your comment above and similar text in your review makes for an interesting conversation.
“…immediately earned a reputation for quality, innovation, handling, speed, and beauty…”
and
“…It isn’t likely for a motorcycle to be all those things today, as “fastest” seems irrelevant, most expensive is a matter of adding zeros…”
The Moto Czysz C1 came to mind as I read that sentiment.
I understand Michael Czysz’s desire to race his ingenious bike (and no way am I 2nd guessing the decision to compete*). In the context of your comment about not being able to replicate the Brough mystique in the modern age, what if Czysz had taken a ‘street bike first’ approach? (similar to Triumph’s market strategy for the 955i and later 675 sport bikes. Those weren’t raced by factory efforts at first).
It is fun (and heartbreaking) to imagine the C1’s potential in this regard. That bike had great ideas, great looks, and to top it off, former racers’ were blown away by its handling ability & the overall riding experience. Even James Parker had promising comments for street bike potential based only on the design concepts brought forth.
The C1’s engine (full of uniqueness, smoothness, sound) combined with the bike’s innovative suspension could have broke through decades’ worth or sameness & vehicle dynamics. The bike’s overall handling may have provided the street bike owner another level of ‘skill’ at speed that was previously unobtainable. And, that could have continued the brough-like mystique. Not outright bike speed, but improved operator speed, done more comfortably.
Remember, the C1’s bike dynamics came before today’s electronic aids.
—–
*decision to compete: how can one not want to race that design, especially at a time when American OEM road racing was (and is) non-existent.
Cheers to these innovators. Boo to the people that want to throw out “snobbery” bs.
Does not cut it for me.
Riding 50+ years, ducati, moto guzzi and a raft of Brit bikes. Looks very contrived and unwieldy. There is no artistry in this bike. The original Georges were advanced for there time but that time is passed. So many manufacturers have surpassed (as they should) the Brough artistry in the following 80 years that they are no longer relevant.
It is pure snobbery to try and re-create this Marque for an A list of pretentious riders who generally would not have a clue about what T.E. Lawrence felt, hunched over the bars.
This is a huge mistake!
I hate that I love it! It fills a nitch/void.
Hi The 90 degree vee twin doesn’t look right and spoils the look of the bike! Its too open but is probably the best engine design from a engineering point of view.
Works for Ducati since 1971…